Next: Union
Up: Operations with sets
Previous: Equality
  Contents
Definition 3.2.7
Let

and

be two sets. The intersection of

and

is the
set of all the elements that

and

have in common. We denote:
Note that
is a subset of
and a subset of
.
Example 3.2.8
Let

and

. Then

.
The intersection of two sets can be repesented using Venn diagrams:
Figure 3:
The intersection of two sets
 |
Proposition 3.2.9 (the commutative law)
Let

and

be two sets. Then the following equality holds:
Proof.
We use truth table with the following notations:
Thus,

is equivalent to

and

is equivalent to

. Our proposition is equivalent to the commutative law for the logical connector

(v.s. Proposition prop commutative law for and).
The commutative law for the intersection of sets can be generalized to the intersection of any (finite) number of sets; the proof is done by induction (v.i. Prop.Definition def Peano).
Proposition 3.2.10 (the associative law)
Let

,

and

be three sets. Then the following equality holds:
We prove it using truth tables, Proposition prop associative law for or, with notations similar to those in the proof of Proposition 2.14.
Figure 4:
Intersection: associative law - first part
 |
Figure 5:
Intersection: asociative law - second part
 |
The associative law for the intersection of sets can be generalized to the
intersection of any (finite) number of sets; the proof is done by induction (v.i. Prop. def Peano).
An extension of the associative law for intersection is as follows. Let
and
be two sets of indices; if
and
are two families of sets, then
Proposition 3.2.11
Let

be any set. Then we have:
This proposition can be proven with truth tables.
Proposition 3.2.12
For any two sets, the following holds:
Here too, use truth tables.
Next: Union
Up: Operations with sets
Previous: Equality
  Contents
root
2002-06-10